Gabriella Da Silva Fick vs Naomi Mckenzie Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Fick has demonstrated slightly more effectiveness on their second serve, securing 41.67% of points, compared to Mckenzie's 37.62%—a key indicator in match predictions.
• Who has the edge in return games? Mckenzie edges out Fick on second serve returns with 48.96% vs. 47.73% but exceeds significantly on first serve returns at 35.48% compared to Fick's 28.94%.
• Under pressure, Fick shows more resilience, saving 46.53% of breakpoints, whereas Mckenzie has managed to save just 39.02%.
• In terms of overall performance, Fick's match-winning percentage stands at 40.54%, exceeding Mckenzie's 30.43%.
• On surface proficiency, Fick performs best on Grass, boasting a 70% win rate, while Mckenzie's highest is a 33% win rate on Hard courts.
• Both players primarily compete in Challenger/ITF tournaments, with Fick winning 42.86% of matches, outperforming Mckenzie's 37.5%.
• Fick often competes against lower-ranked opponents (average rank of 386.84) compared to Mckenzie (average rank of 42.48), affecting their respective records.
• If the match extends to a deciding set, Fick holds a track record of winning 45% of such sets, while Mckenzie hasn't won any in the past year.
• Fick's breakpoint conversion rate is 36.26%, lower than Mckenzie's 50%, a significant detail during breakpoint opportunities.

Editorial Prediction (August 12, 2025, UTC):

In preparation for the upcoming match, the current statistics suggest that Fick may hold a slight edge over Mckenzie.

Fick has demonstrated a higher proficiency in second serve performance and showing resilience under pressure. Their consistent performance on Grass and better record in deciding sets add to their advantages. Additionally, their overall match-winning percentage surpasses Mckenzie's, despite facing lower-ranked opponents frequently.

Mckenzie's strong return games and efficient breakpoint conversion are notable, although their lack of wins in deciding sets could hinder their prospects in a tightly contested match.

Thus, given these factors, Fick is more likely to emerge as the victor in the forthcoming contest.